Discrimination is a broad topic that has weathered the test of time. This misbehavior still exists after the efforts of all humanity to eliminate such acts. Every person may experience such action at some point in their life, especially the marginalized and the minority. But
The government makes all the rules, executes them, and prosecutes whoever disobeys the law. The police are expected to enforce the laws of the land. And when all diplomatic ways of curbing crime fail, they use force to alleviate the problems of crime somehow. In
What Is the IOPC? If you’re familiar with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), then it is almost the same as the Independent Office For Police Conduct (IOPC). This name change has been placed since January 2018. This office still fulfills the same duties as
Do you think you’ve been treated wrongly by the police? Have you been subjected to the police’s abuse/misconduct, incivility, impoliteness, and intolerance; experienced irregularity in procedure; or negligence on duty by police officers? If so, the law says you can make a complaint. In this
Pushing a complaint against a police officer requires transparency among the police and vigilance on the complainant. Every action of the cops must be taken into account by the cops and must be overlooked by the person who filed the complaint. Actions, including questionable conduct
The right to complain against the authorities is one fundamental principle in a democratic nation. This right assures every citizen that democracy is being practiced healthily, as those in power are constantly undergoing balance checks. It also ensures that the power is at the citizen’s
Corruption in any government in any nation is said to be a rampant everlasting problem in governance. A corrupt government means it does not serve its purpose—to serve the people. This problem seems to be challenging to erase, including the issue of police corruption. Those
“Equity” is a term every people preach, yet it is not being practiced every day. This overused word holds, especially with people with mental health illnesses addressing their concerns in the community to the police force. Whether these people with mental health conditions charge a
The police are said to be our trusty agents of peace and order in the community. They are the ones who curb violence and shush those who go against the law. However, some people still have trust issues with the cops. This is especially true
Picture this: you are arguing with your neighbor because you play your favorite tune on a loudspeaker on repeat. They are so sick of it that they call the police on you. You heed the officer’s apprehension right away, but you observe that the same
Openness benefits the justice just like dark and silence benefit the corruption. At the heart of policing is the term of accountability which is nothing but ability to justify operational decisions of decision makers in public. As AAAPPP is targeting corruption and bad faith in decision making processes of police forces, the most efficient way to achieve that purpose is to engage the power of the word: much future wrongdoing can be avoided by the highlighting the previous cases and their outcomes, as when there is wide understanding that the wrong does not pay back, the wrong will find lesser and lesser ‘habitat’ to exist in police forces. The primary ‘habitat’ of the wrongdoing / misconduct is the minds of the police officers, whose ‘army’ in the UK consists of 130,000 people with their own personal situations, emotional state and depth of understanding of ethics. Addressing these minds is much more efficient than actual fighting of the existent wrongdoing itself, which, of course, remains a bright purpose by itself as well.
At the same time, working with the power of the word is dealing with a big power, which must be done in a wise manner and with proper diligence. Gradualness and conservatism in applying the power of publicity is the fundamental principle of AAAPPP in dealing with the principle of openness. Three main stages will be recognized as part of that approach by AAAPPP, which are:
i) The desire to resolve every issue n a proper way without publicity and in accordance with proper guidelines, the Code of Ethics and National Decisions Model.
ii) An anonymized publication of the results of any successfully solved case; OR
iii) A non-anonymized publication of any unresolved case in which a police force had refused to act in accordance with the Code of Ethics and caused AAAPPP to unfold the whole arsenal of its instruments in pursuing the justice.
The third stage is ‘the last resort’ which will be activated only when all the rest options are exhausted.
Make the system work
AAAPPP recognizes that the UK’s legislation has a very well thought system of safeguards, which is being continuously developed. The main risk of any developed system of safeguards is failures, incompetence and bad faith of decision makers exercising powers when implementing those safeguards. AAAPPP is not a political organization, but it will focus on enforcement of the legislation’s safeguards being a powerful instrument of members of civil society of the UK. Only maintenance of a high watermark on the side of decision makers can allow legislation to work in full power and to its deepest purposes. On the other hand, lack of existence of the high standards of integrity of decision makers will always undermine any efforts of the public in enforcing the public interest and justice. That is the case where the strength of a team is equal to the strength of the weakest player of it.
One of the challenges which the UK system of justice has is that those operational decision makers in police forces who are entitled to ‘rule the game’ today, due to the accumulated years of work, started their careers when the perception of standards was much different - 20 or even 30 years ago. Pursuing and reminding the modern way of perception of those standards for those ‘stuck in the past’ is one of the goals of AAAPPP.
Justice for all
One of the main manifestation of bad faith in the work of police forces is considered by AAAPPP to be existence of double standards where members of police forces are served with double-faced approach aimed to bent the practice from what is being stated by the forces publicly. It is one thing to announce publicly that the forces are not tolerable to corruption, it is another thing to pursue that principle with proper diligence in practice.
AAAPPP is not a ‘punishment organization’ targeting to troll or hurt police forces as much as possible, but it will always defend the rights of those affected by injustice and fight for appropriate financial compensations for those who are served unfairly and with abuse of power of the state.
Powerful and coordinated response
Police forces are well established, financed and coordinated internally. Those affected by abuse of power are, in most cases, left one to one when opposing powerful malice and corruption, having neither knowledge of their rights nor resources and, often, readiness to stand for their rights. This situation gives birth to perception of certain level of impunity for those police officers who know how the system works and, even worse – may have ‘the right connections’ and ‘certain respect from the right people’.
Such state of things is a lucrative precursor for abuse of power to happen: understanding and belief into impunity gives birth to the wrongdoing which otherwise could be avoided. The corruption starts in the minds of police officers when they feel lack of accountability and the risks of wrongful conduct. Once started, it will always develop into a vicious cycle of new and opposing the public interest.
AAAPPP will pursue justice through the principle of openness and with gradualness but without a desire to cause pressure on police forces just for the sake of it